Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 179C511004 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65918 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2014 23:56:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 65871 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2014 23:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 65859 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2014 23:56:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:56:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.170] (HELO mail-ve0-f170.google.com) (209.85.128.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:56:15 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i13so6827047veh.1 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=OSpLM4dRTgnyDjNoS6u3iwfhvocCuT/kyJJx96/xH+4=; b=lRfLihMtzPS7ag4cOqYtSP5z/2l4FZ2DOKlz9pq8zEPT0gl8atefnJh2mNmO1PTPoG T6bA8G7etxbk2h+4fwlyY+7SNTlik8nMpPxHmDoaVmjkhBRlk0CHXkjEn4i6Tiew50W9 3E1T528FyeDM/LJ7qv50iyIKVD5LNBwrKyFFFA1Sltwa307jXIecFAYjDgNsSSgCdJic AhRjBVJ2Q4UpTjmkiJ+xHuKfelCdwwQrjjPApsb3veK9sj0Vm7EB0Dksseca6kZpPMcd XSQqnO5dHEnAm81IK7QaZwS3iurvmF0xL8I+dYU1/xuB+LtcOs8Y0nHx/8ajPZGIZfWq 8bpQ== X-Received: by 10.52.139.101 with SMTP id qx5mr18417149vdb.17.1403567750429; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.190.100 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7E50202B-DB66-4524-83D7-E009D2B4EDA1@classsoftware.com> References: <7E50202B-DB66-4524-83D7-E009D2B4EDA1@classsoftware.com> From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mbY-M1LL58mdziWJ7Ls3fOxnP-4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1 To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a8bd22ec41d04fc899500 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51a8bd22ec41d04fc899500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good enough for a 4.13 release. Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the differences from 4.12.1 section Differences from Apache Flex 4.12.1 include: AIR and Flash Player support ------------------------------ - Support Flash Player 14.0 - Support for AIR 14.0 Technically, 4.12.1 also supports FP and AIR 14.0. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Look at the list of changes it does seem more like a 4.12.2 rather than a > 4.13.0. What do other people think? > > Justin --bcaec51a8bd22ec41d04fc899500--