flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3
Date Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:58:26 GMT
I have verified to my satisfaction that is Google's Open Sans and covered
by AL, so would you agree no need to change LICENSE whether bundled or not?

Regarding NOTICE, it is my understanding from the document you linked to
that AL dependencies do not require changes to NOTICE.

The issue with FlexUnit was that stuff was copyright Adobe under BSD which
does require NOTICE and we had to chase down which files were under BSD
and get the NOTICE right.

My concern about the "take" policy is different.  It is a question of
whether you can bundle AL stuff you find in the wild without permission of
the owner.  No policy document I've found says you can't, but Roy keeps
hinting in emails that Apache doesn't take software.


On 6/17/14 7:20 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>If not bundled then no need to add to LICENSE (or NOTICE) but if bundled
>and Apache is not owner we need to state that. I'm not even 100% sure the
>files are from Google, didn't Adobe also release an open source font of
>similar name?

View raw message