flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Collins <ndcoll...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Forward] Please bring back FXG 2.0 export for Flash Pro CC 2014
Date Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:47:18 GMT
I agree on the runtimes, but I would have to say I disagree on the IDE
front. There are already other IDEs out there that eclipse Flash Builder
(pun intended) in terms of robustness. In particular I am thinking of
IntelliJ IDEA, but the same could be said of FDT.

I suppose one could argue that we could bring Flash Builder up to the level
of those other tools, but would the man-hours required to do so be worth
the cost savings of just purchasing one of those other IDEs?


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Sugan Naicker <Sugan@dev-x.co.za> wrote:

> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: roksmediainc@gmail.com [mailto:roksmediainc@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 June 2014 05:59 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Forward] Please bring back FXG 2.0 export for Flash Pro CC
> 2014
>
> We Need it back in Illustrator cc too.
>
> Richard Oren
>
> > On 19 Jun 2014, at 4:35 am, DarkStone <darkstone@163.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just posted a thread on Adobe's Flash Pro CC forum:
> > https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1500413
> >
> > It's about bring back FXG 2.0 export for Flash Pro CC 2014.
> >
> > I think it's pretty important for Flex developers, so please reply +1
> > to that thread if you agree as well, thx : )
> >
> >
> > DarkStone
> > 2014-06-19
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Forward-Please-br
> > ing-back-FXG-2-0-export-for-Flash-Pro-CC-2014-tp38453.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message