Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of
 aharui@adobe.com)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Mustella] still failing, must fix
Thread-Topic: [Mustella] still failing, must fix
Thread-Index: 
 AQHPdYoHWgBovr00z0O3ZEl+oKoRlJtUCjCAgABTOACAAA59AIAAFjqAgAAZ8ID//8cCAIAABEyAgAB4GYD//4v1gA==
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:57:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CFAA3BBE.22C67%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAJs+wW1xu3O7BJz1VK56d2OSmtdV8bWJF4CDAFF8Uaqrkwxtbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJs+wW0mrLeTdjFSxNAx92us_M+D21Dej5650a5ZpNDgNiYTmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <8A9083E5-7747-49B6-8975-25824E20964F@classsoftware.com>
 <CAJs+wW0wcE6ReYDQS=bv=5SX_BxkbXv1LwEvX5ADeyT+MGo40w@mail.gmail.com>
 <DC6DC89C-971A-45BA-A190-838034D675E1@classsoftware.com>
 <07C19D54-11BB-4113-A52B-19ABBB1C2F7A@classsoftware.com>
 <CFAA3514.22C3D%aharui@adobe.com> <CFAA3702.22C46%aharui@adobe.com>
 <EB6F7A48D477254EAB8F675582F80CD72A0DFA5A@DPSBS1.digitalprimates.local>
In-Reply-To: 
 <EB6F7A48D477254EAB8F675582F80CD72A0DFA5A@DPSBS1.digitalprimates.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326
received-spf: None (: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <217FCA074956354DA45F1787309396AB@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

This is Justin's test case that replicates the problem in English.

<?xml version=3D"1.0" encoding=3D"utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx=3D"http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
			   xmlns:s=3D"library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
			   xmlns:mx=3D"library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
initialize=3D"triggerFindConditionRTE()">
=09
	<fx:Script>
		<![CDATA[
			import mx.collections.Sort;
			import mx.collections.SortField;
		=09
			private function triggerFindConditionRTE():void{
				var a:Array =3D new Array();
				var s:Sort =3D new Sort();
				a.push("a");
				s.compareFunction =3D cmpFn;
				var sfArray:Array =3D new Array();
				sfArray.push(new SortField("0"));
				sfArray.push(new SortField("field1"));
				var o:Object =3D new Object();
				o["0"] =3D undefined;
				o["field1"] =3D 2;
				s.fields =3D sfArray;
				s.findItem(a, o, null);
			}
		=09
			// WTF?
			private function cmpFn(o1:Object, o2:Object):void{
			=09
			}
		]]>
	</fx:Script>
=09
</s:Application>

You should get an arg count mismatch.  By changing the (!hasFieldName)
test on Sort.as line 413 I got the expected result ("Find criteria must
contain all sort fields")


On 5/27/14 12:53 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labriola@digitalprimates.net>
wrote:

>>Mike, your thoughts on the logic?  The test sets up two SortFields and a
>>compare function on the Sort (not the SortFields) then calls findItem.
>The first SortField's field name is a non-existent field.  I think the
>old logic would see if the field existed in the data item.  The new logic
>seems to assume the fieldName exists as long as there is no SortField
>compare function and skips the check if the field exists in the data.
>
>
>Let me setup and replicate this scenario and mine locally and see what I
>can do.
>
>Mike