flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7
Date Thu, 01 May 2014 16:20:57 GMT
+1 (binding)

Sigs ok
Rat ok
Build ok
Installed correctly on Mac and Win 7

On 3/15/14 12:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> One followup question:  Do we know for sure that Installer 2.7 fixed up
>> the RSL versions?  I am not seeing any code that does that.  Could I
>> deleted it by accident?
>Only for osmf, that too only after we started supporting OSMF 2.0.  There
>is a method called getFlexVersionBuildString() that reads the
>flex-sdk-description.xml and returns the version and build number.  This
>gets appended to the osmf.swf file name.
>> I'll try it myself tomorrow.
>> -Alex
>> On 3/15/14 12:36 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >On 3/14/14 11:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
>> >>> I'm not sure what "Latest SDK" means.  Is that the nightly?  Did you
>> >>> install it into Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit?
>> >>Latest develop branch.
>> >Sorry, I'm still confused.  If it is the latest develop branch, how is
>> >installer involved?
>> >
>> >>
>> >>> What were you running when you got this error?  Ant on some
>> >>> Which one?
>> >>ant in the air_for_ant directory.
>> >I was about to guess that.  The README for the installer says you have
>> >specify AIR_HOME when building ant_on_air, was it set to some older
>> >version of AIR SDK? It won't pick the AIR SDK out of the SDK specified
>> >FLEX_HOME.  So if you specify AIR_HOME as an AIR 4.0 SDK and then the
>> >build works then this is not an installer issue.
>> >
>> >However, I did notice the README is not quite correct.  The ant_on_air
>> >build does not use FLEX_HOME_WIN and FLEX_HOME_MAC, the installer build
>> >does.  I will fix the README.  It looks like the README is not in the
>> >source package.  Did we fix a README issue for the SDK or Installer
>> >without doing another RC or is another RC required?
>> >
>> >>
>> >>> Crap.  I guess I did not understand how this part of the install was
>> >>> supposed to work.  This is a bug in the install script for 4.12, not
>> >>>the
>> >>> installer.
>> >>This only happens when you use the new installer - so that basically
>> >>means we can release the new installer until we fix the config file
>> >>release 4.12.1.
>> >>
>> >>There should be a way to make them independent of each other and avoid
>> >>this - any ideas?
>> >They are independent.  Other than downloading the binary package,
>> >verifying the MD5, and uncompressing, the rest of the install
>> >responsibilities are in the package, not the installer.  I suspect if
>> >actually use Ant to run the installer.xml you'll have the same
>>problem.  I
>> >know the temptation is to change the installer, but if we ever get the
>> >installer out there, we'll be glad in the future that (hopefully) any
>> >other SDK or FlexJS install issue can be fixed in the SDK and FlexJS
>> >installer.xmls so we only vote on one package and not try to coordinate
>> >two votes and two packages in the future.
>> >
>> >>
>> >>>> -Issue with 4.11 RSL in flex-config.xml
>> >>> More details please?
>> >>As discussed before that are incorrect and have 0 as the build number.
>> >Rats, looks like I missed that before.  I'll have a look in my morning.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >-Alex
>> >

View raw message