flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [FDB] Integration
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:11:44 GMT
If that means users won't be able to debug workers using the SDK until Falcon has been released
as part of it, I don't think that a good idea.

Instead, can we have 2 versions ? one using the current ASC classes and shipped with the current
SDK, the other one in Falcon ?

Frédéric THOMAS

> From: aharui@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:41:33 +0000
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/29/14 9:35 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >The integration of the worker code itself which requires, in order to be
> >total, to modify the Ant script that build FDB in order to link the
> >Falcon sources (AST classes used to evaluate the expression), at the
> >moment I didn't do this part and then still use the old code which
> >required some integration code to work, I would like to commit that but
> >once the build script modified and everything is working, I will commit.
> >Is it fine for you like that ?
> You can check anything you want into the FDBWorkers branch, but IMO, FDB
> should not be using Falcon classes when we check it into the main branch.
> An alternate plan would be to make FDB with workers only available as part
> of Falcon and move it to that repo.
> -ALex		 	   		  
> 
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message