Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C38107AE for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98799 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2014 11:51:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 98677 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2014 11:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 98399 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2014 11:51:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:51:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of frawolff@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-la0-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:51:12 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ec20so5615686lab.39 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 04:50:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RW2tihW32yr6GErWbL4QVketrkDInG0ZV7pPIP0E3rQ=; b=ITojiR3tJj2L/LXZNXkwaRTiCmbrH7CYq66W5cFVP7NcaUB98S5rF9PQ8+kJnm8cC6 p1T2986GRapG2X2T8OlMFBC3yzLN65EahZ/O9cNYZBKZE1eRfBfqZCpCjNEA7tilZr5K zDOk4/0l3RdejiNQpH3KfIozi7LBxXjm0B5IQ2fAvu4dmHKOFB4PNjEQcWuG5EDz0v2T SpEq+xgl4ctO/qVeUvkAVvYjRRI+LpEplCCXRpLVSgx7FSCrJ/IPPtSApd2bRTfpB5GQ kEYAnYnvnMtnwSbbciFIdIPD3wDX7DiPw42LnxIe/hU09PTxi3Qo5rWdijPEG56j4ToO xk8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.201.42 with SMTP id jx10mr53954lbc.91.1396266650268; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 04:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.66.138 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 04:50:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References:

<2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AFAF2D9EA7@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AFAF2D9F45@EXMBX05.netplexity.local>

Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:50:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Third-party tools / solutions on Apache Flex website From: Franck Wolff To: "users@flex.apache.org" Cc: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36b3eb3795604f5e5a915 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c36b3eb3795604f5e5a915 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Any chance to get this page published anytime soon (with Andrew's modifications applied)? Tell me how I can help. Franck. 2014-03-26 17:26 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > Ended up in spam because of the zip attachment. Will try to look later. > > On 3/26/14 2:06 AM, "Franck Wolff" wrote: > > >Anyone? > > > > > >2014-03-25 15:03 GMT+01:00 Franck Wolff : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here is the page about third-party tools and solutions (I don't know if > >> attached files are accepted on this mailing list, tell me). > >> > >> I didn't try to create any comparison table, the projects listed having > >> very different scope / kind of features. Each project / tool is listed > >>with > >> a link and a pitch which comes from their respective websites. Many of > >>them > >> are outdated and inactive, many of them are certainly not compliant with > >> the Apache trademark policy. > >> > >> I have modified a page coming from the Apache Flex website and > >>integration > >> should be straightforward. > >> > >> Franck. > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-03-21 14:28 GMT+01:00 Franck Wolff : > >> > >> > >>> 2014-03-20 19:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On 3/20/14 9:54 AM, "Franck Wolff" wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >I can certainly make sure that GraniteDS website is linking back to > >>>> Apache > >>>> >Flex (we already do that) and following the Apache trademark policy > >>>>(if > >>>> I > >>>> >understand what it is about ;) > >>>> Sounds great. Let us know when you think you've conformed to the > >>>>policy > >>>> and the Apache Flex PMC will review and make suggestions if needed. > >>>>And > >>>> feel free to ask questions on the dev@ list if you're unsure of how > to > >>>> implement the policy. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I think we already comply with the policy: we refer to either "Flex" or > >>> "Apache Flex" on our website and we link to http://flex.apache.org/ on > >>> our main pages. You can certainly find "Adobe Flex" in some of our old > >>>blog > >>> posts and documentations. I have added a notice about "Apache", "Apache > >>> Flex" and "Flex" trademarks at the bottom of our site terms & > >>>conditions ( > >>> > >>> > http://www.granitedataservices.com/contact-us/site-terms-and-conditions- > >>>of-use/). > >>> We also have the full Apache 2 License in our distrib > >>> (licenses/third-party/). > >>> > >>> BTW, according to this page: > >>>http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/list/, > >>> Flex isn't listed as a trademark of Apache but just as a project... > >>> > >>> Anyway, I would be happy if somebody from the Apache Flex PMC can have > >>>a > >>> look at our website and make sure we are not infringing any Apache > >>>policy. > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>>> >However, I can't verify that all related projects are complying to > >>>>your > >>>> >request and I'm certainly not the right person to ask them to do > >>>>so... > >>>> Right, that's the job of the PMC. We should ask each technology owner > >>>> that is going to be in the list to conform before we actually put > >>>>them in > >>>> the list (assuming they are still active). > >>>> > >>> > >>> I will put everything I know related to Flex in the draft, you are free > >>> to remove those who don't comply with the policy. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Franck. > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> -Alex > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --001a11c36b3eb3795604f5e5a915--