Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 992D210143 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28207 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2014 13:45:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 27412 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2014 13:45:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 27398 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2014 13:45:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:45:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tc@extravision.com designates 193.133.125.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.133.125.13] (HELO mail3.evmailer.com) (193.133.125.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:45:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.136] ([192.168.2.136]) by mail3.evmailer.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s2BDixAm012639 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:44:59 GMT Message-ID: <531F135A.3010202@extravision.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:44:58 +0000 From: Tom Chiverton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Flash Player extended support References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/03/14 12:55, Justin Mclean wrote: > Does anyone else think this is a little strange given FP 13.0 is still in beta? v13 of the Player is more like 12.1. Look at the 'new features' on Labs - basically none. And was v12.0 so much different to v11.whatever ? My guess is they've just stripped a ton of code out now they don't have to support Android or other Linux platforms. Tom