flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject AW: ApacheCon Slides
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:44:37 GMT
Ok ... so I just uploaded a new version containing the feedback of you guys ... Hope I didn't
forget anything. 


Will definitely give that speech a test-run next Tuesday at the company I currently work for.
But I think I have to speed up my talk a little ;-)


PS: Thanks for the feedback :-)

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.dutz@c-ware.de] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2014 09:48
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: ApacheCon Slides

Oh ... will go through the presentation again and correct the Flex SDK Thing ... I took the
numbers Justin posted a few days ago ... if it's 40000 that's great and I'll update that too
... wanted to add a note that it will be more as in Flexmojos using companies sometimes one
install could be used by a lot of users.

Von: omuppi1@gmail.com <omuppi1@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2014 00:10
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ApacheCon Slides

Chris, a couple of points:

1.  You seem to switch between the terms 'Flex SDK' and 'FDK' midpoint in the presentation.
 I think we should all be consistently using the term 'Flex SDK'.
2.  The numbers on slide 32 is a outdated. We have more than 40,000 installs of the Flex SDK
since we started keeping track.
3.  Agree with Justin on the shadow of the text.

Otherwise, great job!


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> > I just uploaded my stuf a few minutes ago:
> >
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Building%2
> 0Enterprise%20Level%20Applications%20with%20Apache%20Flex%20and%20Java
> -v9-20140313_1547.pdf
> Lots of info + liking the positive tone you have going there :-)
> You may want to consider dropping the drop shadow on the text IMO 
> makes it a little hard to read.
> Thanks,
> Justin

View raw message