Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-34854-apmail-flex-dev-archive=flex.apache.org@flex.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72DB710A11
	for <apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  3 Feb 2014 05:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 25650 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2014 05:57:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25632 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2014 05:57:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@flex.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@flex.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.flex.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25624 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2014 05:57:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:57:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Received: from [209.85.192.179] (HELO mail-pd0-f179.google.com)
 (209.85.192.179)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:56:59 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q10so6505146pdj.38
        for <dev@flex.apache.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:56:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
         :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=uxymHVbtVOKESEXCWOSmKjm6mkVrURCNdPjsDjd/A+Y=;
        b=ZGccpnJHgM+vGuG9VquGK2WRs2uNAtPDDZhxf2h4NGGqiRaaaxxM2fpVdEAjgLfR/V
         d4wlguz4VqNH0kG7vA99iVKPH3OblM8iLZWWnnCp0fY4LJcxseJzvOcyclKJ+AYLFtdL
         cwzI7OYYL3UZFC7Kt5UUbYe8vryZA6Xn8OcVXylCFkIpPYzzGJClAF4r6RXAJhrKECv3
         FS2seEWD4V8y9bZfcYQkolROdSOAz+QoXhAUSpH7z9WgUdIxz7NC2ObhEp1MufoIOjoK
         +NQcs+86Iweh+3/r2XelWAgjFxm8/7+1lkZSRRKX7mANTmWvPAmzZyl0Bc15eAzSZjFE
         QWGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQkzCjQYxmUnme+X4NqhyyyDVcYI2cG/ig69TGm0D8ABFLKgQCek1VVw9A/CX14Y225eHp4t
X-Received: by 10.69.0.39 with SMTP id av7mr35221325pbd.4.1391406997914;
        Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (58-6-45-113.dyn.iinet.net.au. [58.6.45.113])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 tu3sm52146962pbc.40.2014.02.02.21.56.35
        for <dev@flex.apache.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.12 release
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF146019.18630%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:56:33 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9D6EA080-A67F-4D2F-A2C4-66795FEF1D43@classsoftware.com>
References: <96CD69C4-CF7C-443D-9965-B119C86BCC16@classsoftware.com>
 <CF146019.18630%aharui@adobe.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

HI,

> Also, we need to decide whether we are going to release both Java 6 =
and
> Java 7 binaries.=20

I'm still not sure there anything that effects end users, Java 7 can use =
Java 6 compiled jars right? Do we know if say the Java 7 compiled mxmlc =
is any fasters etc? I wouldn't expect any huge differences.

Justin=