Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27DC710D36 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39739 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 01:48:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 39661 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 01:48:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 39653 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2014 01:48:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:48:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.220.50] (HELO mail-pa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.220.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:48:47 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kp14so1200563pab.23 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:48:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xnK4cp4T3gGIEOUDzbyNlZUWlVbPNi/HaH4giifnnTM=; b=hUn8bp6ugwXbzNUZvx2sdAosqHdsPO77o5+Tz3jq4fZNN0+6CkkTL74i1RzU6pJ3Hz 2HigJloKJpKi94tNLg7qDQTLpPG8xHjYVpwPi4HPNibeZjMdHG+qUxGPSU6sJWyBfw1u ok6T0z3cjmg1mFq3XjGkIn2GqLf8sTW1/CNs8OrRUIMfIsO//gYTETzqfYWho5n6gAii OUCuwFkw+yrgVWbksz/9Rpsqcg8G9hlGClVS5THHFKrww3fOxaRAxjTdSmGVjeEvVtYf VfTeAX60V6RdGm/hvo2vT3V8e9QveTAvMEKx3Lh+OJhPpbnslwW/UedlJcx6Q1xfapVt rioA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRiyVBUkbaliZ36JO/J4vNHdbd+VUaW0HVOvM31I4gs6u6M84SzvjYjOdMwUY0hDh45108 X-Received: by 10.68.237.133 with SMTP id vc5mr5882319pbc.92.1392860906304; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:48:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (58-6-45-113.dyn.iinet.net.au. [58.6.45.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm13336063pas.10.2014.02.19.17.48.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:48:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 733 - Failure! From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:48:23 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79A222FE-E3D4-48D6-BC95-A223F7344B09@classsoftware.com> References: <3835789.7.1392744918193.JavaMail.FLEX-MUSTELLA$@flex-mustella> <49A8E972-CE43-44AD-ADF2-42CA7432768A@apache.org> <2C74EAA2-4305-4A52-843D-2AD76AEF873C@classsoftware.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I grabbed the bad.png.* files after the last failure run. I just took = a > look and of the two I looked at (Border and one of the FCK) both are > showing slightly different scrollbar thumb sizes Any idea why they might be different here and not in the 1000's of other = tests? How different are we talking? > For the sake of the tests, it might be better if the change made sure = the > thumb size is set to something so we can get consistent results. So your suggesting that the SDK code should set the scrollbar size? Thanks, Justin=