flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Doroshko <alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com>
Subject Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:38:31 GMT
As I said I think there's no need in XXX-START/XXX-END markers at all. 
IDE that passed -ide param treats all var values as escaped.

On 17.01.2014 14:59, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE-  :-) and maybe keep -ide instead of
-escaped-var-values if we need something else applied for IDEs later.
>
> Any other thoughts ?
>
> Thanks,
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:12 +0400
>> From: alexander.doroshko@jetbrains.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
>>
>> Yes, something like fdb -escaped-var-values.
>> If enabled then there's no need in start/end markers (like
>> "IDEA-ESCAPE-START"/"IDEA-ESCAPE-END"), as var values are always
>> escaped. Implementation of escape() method is there in my StringUtil class.
>>
>> On 17.01.2014 14:33, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
>>> hum, what do you mean, something like "fdb -ide" ?
>>>
>>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:29:32 +0400
>>>> From: alexander.doroshko@jetbrains.com
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to introduce
a new first level helper command which would set a boolean value to apply this escapes, does
it make sense ?
>>>> Or may be just add undocumented command line option.
>>>    		 	   		
>   		 	   		


Mime
View raw message