Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C3710F79 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12892 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2013 08:27:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 12850 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2013 08:27:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 12717 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2013 08:27:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:27:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:27:29 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id q12so302620vbe.6 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:27:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ScCLJFXiBVkFSVtQ+KZDXRQ3r/Erner3KVgVLGxx/OA=; b=AEfnX0KyFjM7QwCThTvJJl6ahjtNSpJs3NgWWzPqlQCoo3L8xzTo7oJumvEb/+YYea +HOBDVsd/KRrM+l+McjnUpEcJZ6JrHk1F9d1gE+8sqUpFIJhe04CaCKzDqYZ7CHBpBmm MY7bzV011MdGeGhIGRxeK7VW5SPUdsT9/WbjUfUL+F3O8L/4Cic6IqIUwNvZB3jQgSld MJbQPgeT+gVOWp/qyjGjCZzekF3oh1x9ObxaLN0463T1Is3QnOtTVtHiNZt1jYq6UDDd 1vI9JVWIrEkvsxlTEkvPhWlu7qvNvKd+F67G4XdlcSDWHvzjGWpa374S9PXQpPywm/T8 oQtA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.232.135 with SMTP id to7mr172463vdc.58.1386664029032; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:27:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.206.17 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.206.17 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:27:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F554356@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F55439F@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:27:08 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: o_PiVSC7A66EAW_KM70dU7GtSj4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed From: OmPrakash Muppirala To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01161c06df982704ed29e0bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01161c06df982704ed29e0bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Dec 10, 2013 12:13 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > In addition to the various "legal" issues with binaries in the repo, > we'd be masking the cause of this failure. In order to prevent further > deterioration of the build process, we need to figure out what went > wrong and fix it. > > EdB > > PS. Thanks for leaving the keyboard on the Mustella VM set to FR... > Took me while to figure out that I hadn't gone insane or if my > keyboard was broken ;-) Oh, that's what it was. I spent a whole session copy pasting commands from my computer on to the VM :-) > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Maurice Amsellem > wrote: > >> someone who does use the pbj's will grab the nightly and complain. > > > > I don't understand. > > Why would someone complain if the pbj's are in the nightly? > > > > [From the other emai] > >>Apache repos aren't supposed to contain compiled code. The pbj files were removed during the initial release audit. > >>I don't think a workaround can involve checking in the pbj files. But we could borrow them from a prior release package temporarily. > > > >>So we could make the compilation conditional on a env parameter, and > >>set that in the Jenkins job accordingly? > >>Yes but ... > > > > Alex, the conversation is getting out synch, so I am not sure that I have understood what you said. > > > > So can we include the pbj in the repo, and have a parameter to conditionally compile the pbj ? > > - This parameter would be set by default to do the compilation (so that folks can recompile) > > - and turned off on the b.a.o vm, with pre-compiled pbj's. > > > > > > Maurice > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl --089e01161c06df982704ed29e0bd--