flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maurice Amsellem <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
Subject RE: Question on StringUtil.trim
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:07:50 GMT
Thanks Benoit.  So it's slice that does the optimization.

Maurice

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Benoit Wiart [mailto:b.wiart@ubik-ingenierie.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 14 novembre 2013 09:03
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question on StringUtil.trim

I had the same question a few weeks ago
And I think the fash sdk is optimized in this case as Scout didn't report any memory allocation


Le 14 nov. 2013 à 05:33, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> a écrit :

> 
> 
> On 11/13/13 8:23 PM, "labriola@digitalprimates.net"
> <labriola@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> 
>>> No idea.  I was trying to think of any danger of manipulating the 
>>> returned string if it is the original and not always a copy, but I 
>>> can't think of anything off-hand.
>> 
>>> Is it much faster to add the check and return the original?
>> 
>> 
>> Aren't AS strings immutable anyway? So, the method got a copy to 
>> begin with from the stack, but it is always a copy so, if the check 
>> is any faster, returning the original shouldn't be able to cause an issue.
> I don't really know how it works.  I think Strings are effectively 
> immutable because there is no "in-place" manipulation APIs (no setCharAt).
> I don't think you get a copy on the stack, but I could be wrong, I 
> thought you just got the pointer/reference, but someone could verify 
> that with a profiler.  I also don't know if there is a quick check 
> inside String.slice that returns the original if the indexes indicate 
> the entire string.
> 
> -Alex
> 


Mime
View raw message