Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E878C10544 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97458 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2013 19:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 97371 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2013 19:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 97133 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2013 19:57:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maurice.amsellem@systar.com designates 66.129.85.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.129.85.153] (HELO smtp02.myhostedservice.com) (66.129.85.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:57:38 +0000 Received: from EXHUB01.netplexity.local (172.29.211.21) by smtp02.myhostedservice.com (172.29.211.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.347.0; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:57:13 -0400 Received: from EXMBX05.netplexity.local ([fe80::cc58:cfe7:ba3b:fae]) by exhub01 ([172.29.211.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:57:15 -0400 From: Maurice Amsellem To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Subject: RE: describeType still used in many places in SDK Thread-Topic: describeType still used in many places in SDK Thread-Index: Ac7Fw6Mdp3Rv3fP3RKGxYqxIWoM9AwALuguAAAg5nVD//8YYgIAAQuNQ///IXYCAAAMigIAAOxOg///OsoCAADfRMIAAblJwgADateD//pJyAAAHk+lwAAX/FAAAE/kfUA== Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:57:15 +0000 Message-ID: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F532E95@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> References: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F532E33@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.211.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I will use Parsley's Spicefactory implementation as a reference, to know ho= w to access elements. (I will not steal the code). Maurice=20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20 Envoy=E9=A0: jeudi 10 octobre 2013 21:44 =C0=A0: dev@flex.apache.org Objet=A0: Re: describeType still used in many places in SDK On 10/10/13 12:31 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Yes, I am just calling describeType vs decribeTypeJSON. > >JSON is returning an unstructured object with the following props: >isDynamic: Bool >isFinal: bool >isStatic: bool >name: String >traits > accessors: Array of unstructured Objects . > bases: Array of Strings , for the hierarchy of supers > interfaces > metadata > methods > variables > constructor > >Access should have same performance than E4X .. ? OK, I might be remembering incorrectly. I thought describetype's XML was n= ot flat and the superclass's accessors were not listed with the subclass's = accessors. If you can get to all accessors of all superclasses in one shot= then yes, it won't matter. -Alex