Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CC5A10C97 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2658 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2013 19:10:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2638 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2013 19:10:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2630 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2013 19:10:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:10:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maurice.amsellem@systar.com designates 66.129.85.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.129.85.153] (HELO smtp02.myhostedservice.com) (66.129.85.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:10:38 +0000 Received: from EXHUB02.netplexity.local (172.29.211.22) by smtp02.myhostedservice.com (172.29.211.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.347.0; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 15:10:17 -0400 Received: from EXMBX05.netplexity.local ([fe80::cc58:cfe7:ba3b:fae]) by exhub02 ([172.29.211.22]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 15:10:17 -0400 From: Maurice Amsellem To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Subject: RE: Issue with CallOut ASDOC Thread-Topic: Issue with CallOut ASDOC Thread-Index: Ac7CriLivCVFIHWySkq94ce6xfl7IwAKAp4AAAXpW9D///KhgIAAQmPQgACBhrA= Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:10:17 +0000 Message-ID: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F52F349@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> References: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F52F2AE@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F52F300@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F52F32C@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> In-Reply-To: <2095F5EBE04D59409DFCE91FFCEBF7AF3F52F32C@EXMBX05.netplexity.local> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.211.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org "arised" of course :-). My English need some improvement Maurice=20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsellem@systar.com]=20 Envoy=E9=A0: dimanche 6 octobre 2013 21:03 =C0=A0: dev@flex.apache.org Objet=A0: RE: Issue with CallOut ASDOC >In fact, I like the mobile skin. Perhaps we can use the same skin for des= ktop as well? We may want to lighten the default background color to match= that of the default >Flex spark skins, though. Totally agree. The desktop skin is very dull in comparison. So a lighter = mobile skin would be perfect for Desktop. So I will first try to merge the two host components in one, and then "PC-i= ze" the mobile skin. Do you know if any problems aroused when working on the experimental callou= t, so that I can avoid them (ie, benefit from previous experience) ? Regards, Maurice=20 -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash= Muppirala Envoy=E9=A0: dimanche 6 octobre 2013 20:55 =C0=A0: dev@flex.apac= he.org Objet=A0: Re: Issue with CallOut ASDOC On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsellem@systar= .com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > Actually, after looking at the experimental CallOut code, it's 95%=20 > similar to the original Callout. > > I don't know the story from the beginning, but I think it has been=20 > monkey-patched because the properties "actualHorizontalPosition" and=20 > "actualVerticalPosition" were protected, to make them accessible=20 > (mx_internal). > > So now that I know how to change and recompile the SDK :-), > > I just made that simple change (ie protected =3D> mx_internal) in the=20 > original Callout class, and I can know use it in desktop (ie the=20 > callout pops up) > > Of course, I used a dumb Skin, to it does not look like a callout at=20 > all, but it should be feasible to adapt the experimental CallOutSkin=20 > to make it work on the original class. > And it probably needs some more testing to make sure it works fine. > > So maybe we don't even need two classes, after all. > > After all, all other spark components (List, Panel, etc..) have the=20 > same hostComponent , and only differ by their skin on mobile and=20 > desktop platforms. > > What do you think? > I remember that there was a discussion about this a while ago. Unsure as t= o why we decided on a new component. But I agree with you that we should merge these two components into one. In fact, I like the mobile skin. Perhaps we can use the same skin for desk= top as well? We may want to lighten the default background color to match = that of the default Flex spark skins, though. Thanks, Om > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] De la part de=20 > OmPrakash Muppirala Envoy=E9 : dimanche 6 octobre 2013 18:54 =C0 : > dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Issue with CallOut ASDOC > > On Oct 6, 2013 9:13 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"=20 > > wrote: > > > > Hi Team, > > > > I have noticed some classes asdoc link is broken on > flex.apache.org/asdoc > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33802 > > > > I propose an explanation and two possible fixes , but not sure what=20 > > to > do, because I don't know how the release builds are done and deployed. > > > > Can you please confirm/contradict the proposed explanation and which=20 > > fix > should be implemented. > > +1 for renaming the fault class names. > > Thanks for catching this! > > Om > > > > > Regards, > > > > Maurice Amsellem > > SYSTAR R&D - BusinessBridgeFX > > >