flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: License Stuff
Date Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:37:26 GMT
I can't see how 1 or more pom.xml on their server could help Alex,  we need
artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I mean trees
entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again :-) ?

-Fred

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: License Stuff

Adobe did not want to deal with registration or a way to avoid the license
dialog, but I'm pretty sure we got permission to put up pom.xml files on the
current downloads server.

On 10/29/13 2:29 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that.
>
>-Fred
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 
>2013 22:20 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff
>
>
>
>On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air 
>>license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but 
>>only in only one full and original distribution.
>Yes, that's probably true, and the runtimes are part of the SDK.  I 
>don't think they make a distribution without the runtimes.
>
>Just to be sure, we once talked about Adobe putting pom.xml files on 
>its downloads server.  Have we decided that is insufficient and a 
>distribution agreement is better? Either way, there is some sort of a 
>license acceptance requirement unless we can get an exemption.
>
>-Alex
>


Mime
View raw message