Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-30060-apmail-flex-dev-archive=flex.apache.org@flex.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B69BC1069E
	for <apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 93132 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2013 16:04:04 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93080 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2013 16:04:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@flex.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@flex.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.flex.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92651 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2013 16:04:02 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:04:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=SPF_FAIL,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF
 processing of domain of michael.scharp@fmr.com)
Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:03:57 +0000
Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139])
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <michael.scharp@fmr.com>)
	id 1VK9MS-0004Zf-Gz
	for dev@flex.apache.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:03:16 -0700
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: mscharp <michael.scharp@fmr.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <FF67B2AAFAE89448ABE4AC76EE1604C30163658F2047@MSGDALCCRD2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM>
In-Reply-To: 
 <3B222F2E298C7C45ACC98C05DCA6BECD4A1D6D3370@ECCR13PUBLIC.exchange.local>
References: <1378924737605-29528.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <3B222F2E298C7C45ACC98C05DCA6BECD4A1DA207CB@ECCR13PUBLIC.exchange.local>
 <134FBCD3-4EC2-4D62-AE68-E4951B54FCD2@classsoftware.com>
 <3B222F2E298C7C45ACC98C05DCA6BECD4A1D6D3370@ECCR13PUBLIC.exchange.local>
Subject: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
 getAdvancedTelemetry()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Thanks for the responses Chris.  Yeah, FM is a beast to build.  I can't say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.

So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of the FDK you wanted to use.  I'm assuming this is incorrect.  Has anyone tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK?  My only question with it having to do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM source code.

As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed, and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex applications from the same domain... which we are.  So, previously in our pom files we had:

                                 <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>charts</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>rpc</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>mx</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>spark</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>
                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>caching</scope>
                                </dependency>

Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms.  I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms.  So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not.  If I do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like this?

                                <dependency>
                                                <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
                                                <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
                                                <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
                                                <type>swc</type>
                                                <scope>rsl</scope>
                                </dependency>

Again, thanks everyone for the help.

Michael

From: christofer.dutz@c-ware.de [via Apache Flex Development] [mailto:ml-node+s2333347n29584h11@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM
To: Scharp, Michael
Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()

Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the testsuite to fail.

Chris

________________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1>
Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()

Hi,

> This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files).
Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are just not signed.

Thanks,
Justin
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html
To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>.
NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>




--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.