flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Updated] (FLEX-33488) FlexUnit
Date Thu, 29 Aug 2013 04:57:05 GMT
Hi,

> You mean for instance "FlexUnit 4.2" instead of "FlexUnit Next"?
Yep.

>  But which number for next version should we use?
4.2 is as good as any and the tag can be edited if it's not 4.2.

You could also rename "FlexUnit Next", but if you look at what happened with the next tag
for the Flex SDK you'll see it's all over the place and actually misleading in a few places.
ie saying something was fixed in the next version when that version has been released.

Justin
Mime
View raw message