Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E945CC0DF for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15235 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 05:53:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 15007 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 05:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 14999 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2013 05:53:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.41] (HELO mail-oa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.219.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:53:23 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j6so2610770oag.14 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:52:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VwbV+F2PO2Ny9Qvo0Gofs8ms++a5fdGpKU7+Itq2KmQ=; b=oIIQYO/fx3LAzjCvlMmcpyxQJ1KGnV66ebphGMEcyfBOCoPzn15koAHNhTCRU5ohkd iyaVmwIR/wlom/F6L71d6niPScpD5fR2ZAtciDtOLGfGLntJAoxwAlVx/ZQyedrecUCi RupoiSqYsDUJDcuSkkXzJ54eXvgEnvneKrMUdjlAk5DAPVNwNU7HwEapiIbD4PIYhCdJ hiZrbq4JMJeX8yxvpjqnEVMqmYlIxSXIrqt41M6o6tKOGeS++qqbaeWwfl5k6zItFEdd UCxFHmv3XILOtPUF8J0hUX5iHW8ZBEGptKFIOR9/4GmTzc0P8IY+FB1YwLZ91r6Z2kwg +bRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.138.167 with SMTP id qr7mr1436624igb.0.1375077162494; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.161 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:52:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release From: Erik de Bruin To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5e8Epr/8ZNwxx5vTRXVC6zrHC5rCIZLgTTsV29iAS55BF9RZ5cofMxIAD+gQqHq9EcHiR X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 on the fix and reverting. Thank you Alex for figuring those out. I think we should actively prevent the 'New Project' issue from occurring. All we need to do is change the version number to something with only single digits. That really couldn't be simpler, could it? 5.0 has my vote. This is not something people will be able to overlook. It is not an obscure RTE in a feature few use, will happen each time they create a new project. Doing nothing but adding a note in the docs will leave a bad impression and will taint this release and - more importantly - the still fragile image of the project. People, especially the press and bloggers, tend to look at the negatives, no matter how awesome the rest is. EdB On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 7/28/13 9:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>> What day do you get in the airplane? >>Thursday your time. > OK, do we have consensus on taking both the resource module fix and > reverting Ilist? > If so, I will check them into the release4.10 branch sometime tomorrow > after Europe has had a chance to weigh in on this thread. > > Then we have to work out wording for whatever to say about the "New > Project" issue and put that in the release notes. I'm thinking we should > should put in something generic that points to our wiki for the "latest > news". That way if we get a patch from Adobe we can update just the wiki. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl