Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A288E1024D for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22977 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 00:07:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 22949 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2013 00:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 22941 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2013 00:07:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:07:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of windowns@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.179] (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:07:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fb19so118341obc.10 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:06:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Bk9On5meJ3uZRgLoNLcl9AjqaXScFwc8VLcoQU8gI1Q=; b=IJ1GL37D18qmgPHKbRD91hbzlMuNVXq6xl9Il3JJPY0AjQRSChyjkunltubodjZpAZ v63bL5jVxBXL+hyHYn/RFjxWUOXD78fXwfVSgA8Ap6un3oV79nZZQdYLgQ2zXQ6OgrzR nCrKBiowHDzE0iRSkGbcfibvXYTyCy61RPRy8PJWHTfnECxmiWKykg3YTDDy4WRTAs+u 04c7nc7+46vH+I59G6hVFle4MrnO61c1UXMpOQfUYu5tnsqWcUb28vW7VHoqyeYj6jpc 9u+rGlmgAMsAqHPJA4PPC8LhAIbQecNpXs1vUY46Vy+SdK6JwQjqZ2UShRmFa+6Dd1sV aFNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.133.14 with SMTP id oy14mr65026347oeb.84.1375229211908; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.240.230 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:06:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51F628E0.6030608@jetbrains.com> <51F62C70.7060201@jetbrains.com> <51F7FDF2.1010606@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:06:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex 4.10.0 Release Status From: Chris Martin To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b472746a9212704e2c3805b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b472746a9212704e2c3805b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Paul, I changed version to 4.6.0 in the ..\sdks\4.9.1\flex-sdk-description.xml file and design view works just fine. But I don't bank on it all the time. Eventually, like Nick, i'll have to re-train my brain and stop using Design view. Really a bummer they stopped working on that, it's great for quickly laying things out and tweeking positions of UI elements without itterating builds just to see how a 1 pixel adjustment looks. Chris On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > Paul, > > Design View is no longer supported for anything that we (Apache) produce. > Flash Builder 4.6 and below tied the specific SDK version with a special > module within the IDE that was used to render the DV. We don't have the > ability to patch FB4.6 (esp. since FB 4.7 replaced it, and no longer > support DV). > > Unfortunately, this is one thing that we have no control over. Adobe was > very clear that DV was end-of-life as of 4.6. According to them, they felt > nobody used it, so it wasn't worth supporting anymore. (I personally used > it all the type to lay out my apps before I did any coding, but have since > retrained my brain to do it via code). > > I know some of the other IDEs have taken a stab at doing something like DV > -- I don't think any of them got very far (IntelliJ has something that > renders the display in near-realtime, but it is not a click-and-drag type > of interface like you may be used to). > > -Nick > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Paul Hastings >wrote: > > > On 7/30/2013 10:17 PM, Chris Martin wrote: > > > >> I use FB 4.6 and I actually have to modify the flex-sdk-description file > >> to > >> say 4.6.0 because when it detects newer versions of Flex, it will > >> forceably > >> say that the version of flex is not compatible with design view. Still > >> trying to get an eye out for an IDE that supports a design view so I can > >> move off of Flash Builder 4.6 > >> > > > > what exactly did you modify? when i simply changed "version" to "4.6.0" > in > > that file, the design view button does become enabled but FB only shows a > > black or light gray screen when you try to use it. if i want a > functioning > > design view i have to swap to sdk 4.6.0 (but do that a few times & > eclipse > > becomes violently drunk & has to be shut down). > > > > > > > > > --047d7b472746a9212704e2c3805b--