flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Attention: another possible show stopper, please verify
Date Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:24:36 GMT
Ugh.  Thanks for checking it out.

So the SDK name still showed up as 4.10?  I suppose we could just leave
the version element at 4.9.9 with a comment saying we had to do that for
FB.  But I wonder if the version element is used elsewhere?


On 7/26/13 7:52 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" <cyrill.zadra@gmail.com> wrote:

>With following steps I could create new flash builder projects again
>with no errors.
>1) Changed <version> element in flex-sdk-description.xml from 4.10.0 to
>2) Configure SDK in Flash Builder
>3) Create new Project with newly configured SDK
>My sdk was installed with Apache Flex Installer. So I would say the
>problem ist the version number.
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> In one of the past releases, we messed up the core.swc build script and
>> didn't catch it until after release.  It seems like we should make sure
>> this is in fact a bug in FB and not some other thing we messed up that
>> under our control before releasing.  So somebody should try a build
>>with a
>> 4.9.9 version number just to be sure.  I'll see if I can get another
>> computer going on it.
>> Clearly we all have different opinions on quality, but a problem in the
>> first thing a newbie tries with FB New Project wouldn't make us look
>> good and attract more people, especially if we can find a way around it,
>> and shipping with known regressions doesn't help either.  Very recently,
>> OpenOffice also voted to release and was in the process of copying their
>> bits to dist when they stopped because an issue was found.  Just because
>> you have the votes doesn't mean you have to deploy those bits.
>> -Alex
>> On 7/26/13 7:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>And I really have to say this is not exactly a show stopper or critical
>>>issue. This need to put into perspective as there a very simple work
>>>around eg just fix/edit the code yourself. It's an inconvenience at
>>>nothing to do with the SDK itself, and not everyone uses Flash Builder.
>>>I'm not sure we can ever fix the issue, without revering the version
>>>number to 4.9.2 or something silly. We should be asking Adobe to fix it
>>>not using it as yet another excuse to not make a release.
>>>The vote for the release candidates has passed and was successful. As
>>>release manager I'm willing to give a couple of days grace to see if any
>>>solutions for any "outstanding" issues can be found and consider
>>>a new release candidate to put up for another vote, but beyond they can
>>>go into the next point release, anything more than that is really going
>>>against Apache policy.

View raw message