Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com
 designates 157.55.2.84 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <DUB118-DS17C707EED37CDC17D49B10B48E0@phx.gbl>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
To: <dev@flex.apache.org>
References: 
 <CAE3jacHWhS3SeaRm+7gMOiwKZgC6_sSm5B181WSv2Ov_bLNFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <F92EDFE6-984D-4F11-9CB1-54A036EB7ECB@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <F92EDFE6-984D-4F11-9CB1-54A036EB7ECB@classsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: What should happen to Cairngorm 3?
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:20:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal

It was someone from Adobe, Alex Uhlmann, it seems even I've seen one email 
of him on this list once.

-Fred

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:50 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: What should happen to Cairngorm 3?

Hi,

I don't see much point with it being merged with the SDK, and if donated I 
don;t see why it couldn't live along side the SDK just like Swiz whcih is 
currently being donated.

The license is compatible (MIT) but we would still need a ICLA or software 
grant from the owners and any contributors of the code. Do we know who they 
are and would they be willing to donate it and look after it under Apache?

Thanks,
Justin