Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02B4A10D6A for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70766 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2013 09:47:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 70687 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2013 09:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 70673 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2013 09:47:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:47:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of megharajdeepak@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.174] (HELO mail-ie0-f174.google.com) (209.85.223.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:47:01 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 9so3748145iec.33 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:46:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YPypUJ69aS3OnsGVwq6Z4E9YHvLe5D7svoGVYVFek8c=; b=vxkSCleiz4Jke9XJYBoB3cn7MEcj+iK2cLx29MExM017b+ZjJaVJN2Dd8i48GffcCQ Gs3jMLS2w72H30Nf7e2RcvF/2S8S+e0MKou9nFGTpRsJTBOVS3mjNBaVM9s9Vb0Drmgf ZT/jnq7JEOC9i3ugznchmItiPl9K+IburKJQ7zENVFFuiS/3xIU0AH+dkZs/kSLNVjAB eZwl0FGqSsuSUEBMfjXlslZm3Y13DR0kRm1JWD2xwU9EoW6QDy1T6mES/WcrMEjRbca2 cW6K2lZsPbK4r+OgkzBxErX9nucb4xsaxm0WdY9jeiw+1eJFOQK+qZlV2FhJZHY5pjR7 d0FQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.152.34 with SMTP id uv2mr514361igb.11.1370944000370; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.225.227 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:46:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <008401ce6601$a7b17b30$f7147190$@usa.net> References: <008401ce6601$a7b17b30$f7147190$@usa.net> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:16:40 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex app using images From: Deepak MS To: users@flex.apache.org Cc: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c01c26321a04deddc654 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0149c01c26321a04deddc654 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Great! That was really helpful to start off. I bet you! Such a pain to shift from photoshop to illustrator. But as you said, it would be fruitful! Just happen to read through some articles. I can use fxg documents from illustrator in flex and keep it vector completely. Thanks again.. Cheers! On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Tianzhen Lin wrote: > Flex/Flash is vector-based UI, when all assets are expressed in the form of > vector, the UI can easily go resolution-independent, that means your app > would look just as sharp on 72-dpi old monitor, to 120/150-dpi modern > monitor all the way to retina display on iPhone 4 and above. > > With image/bitmap-based approach, if you supply multiple version of images > catering each resolution, you will have optimal display quality but it > increases the burden of image preparation. This is not issue of Flex or > Flash, it is any bitmap-based approach will have this problem, notably > HTML/HTML 5. > > If you opt for not supplying multiple versions of images, you will then > force the app to resize an image, which is generally an expensive operation > especially if you turn on interpolation for better display quality. > > With the shortcoming of Photoshop-base UI mockup, lately I have been > switching over to Adobe Illustrator for UI design, it is painful at first > but the investment is well worth for the outcome. > > Tangent > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deepak MS [mailto:megharajdeepak@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 1:43 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Cc: users@flex.apache.org > Subject: Flex app using images > > Hi there, > > Just wanted to check if we can built an app in flex by using sliced > images(all the screens of the app) from a UI design done in Photoshop(or > any > UI editing tool), without any performance issues? > > > > I have been working on iPad apps by just skinning the components. But > sometimes there are some UI designs which are difficult to achieve by > skinning. > > > > Hence wanted to know if we can extensively use images to build an app in > flex. Something like these: > > http://dribbble.com/shots/172145-Mobile-admin-dashboard-iPad-UI-UX-iOS > > http://dribbble.com/shots/722800-Experiment-with-Metro-UI/attachments/68300 > > > > Kindly let me know what can be the best approach. > > > > Cheers, > > Deepak > > --089e0149c01c26321a04deddc654--