Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jazzmatadazz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CDD224D6.A910%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAGw=_tx8w8k+49tRLvsRhTG-4EQxiDkfL_7Ra0thLgyLiCC-WA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CDD224D6.A910%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 20:17:27 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGw=_tz3gz3QfctADTFd=vrBSD=njWbMmZrPGLgnZxWqmhHLVw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Flex June Report
From: Alain Ekambi <jazzmatadazz@gmail.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012956041f117304de43fa62

--089e012956041f117304de43fa62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Looking at it to  from that angle it does make sense to include Flash4j in
that report.
Just ignore the question.

Cheers,

Alain


2013/6/3 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>

>
>
> On 6/3/13 10:17 AM, "Alain Ekambi" <jazzmatadazz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >With the risc of sounding biased
> >aint Flash4j something community related ?
> Yes, Flash4j is community related, but I don't think Flash4j activity
> deserves specific mention in a report to the Apache board which is
> reviewing dozens of reports from a wide variety of communities.  But if
> others feel like it should be mentioned, I'll be happy to add it.
>
> -Alex
>
>

--089e012956041f117304de43fa62--