flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Costa <igorco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Oprtional MVC/IOC Frameworks Donation: Swiz Framework Donation
Date Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:29:19 GMT
I've explained in my previous e-mail, why I vote -1 (binding).

Maybe you missed the e-mail on previous thread. But here's the mention.

A year back, someone at Flex Brazil group asked me why we couldn't simple
> have a MVC approach into the SDK.
> My short answer was We prefer you decide which way you want to code,
> rather than force you on our perspective way.
> For mature and freedom of choice we should not have such only a way of
> coding, like explicit someone to code on that specific way.
> We have a plethora of Flex frameworks out there, if we include one, we
> should include all of it.
> For the freedom of choice that's why I voted -1.

Igor Costa

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Dasa Paddock <dpaddock@esri.com> wrote:

> +1 (non binding)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message