flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?
Date Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:11:05 GMT
Ok, I think commits@ is it. Om's argument hits home, builds break
because of commits :-)

If no major objections, I'll implement this the coming week.

EdB



On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:27 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think commits@f.a.o would be the best place.  Builds break because of bad
> commits (most of the times)
> Moreover an additional list (ex. builds@f.a.o) would be a bit of an
> overkill.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> commits@ or issues@ I would say what is better but what is sure is it
>> pollutes the dev list.
>>
>> Those 2 lists are followed as well by committers or at least PMCs,
>> otherwise what do you thing about another list builds@ ? does it worth ?
>>
>> -Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:35 PM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/13 12:32 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> I was just wondering: would it be better if I have Jenkins send the
>>> Mustella run emails to 'issues@'?
>>>
>> Wouldn't commits@ be better?
>>
>>
>>> The way it stands now, all three runs (main, AIR and mobile) have
>>> tests failing (even after -failures). This means that per full run,
>>> three emails will be sent... twice a day. That will put even Justin's
>>> JIRA email production to shame ;-) I think it will be cleaner if I
>>> direct those emails somewhere they don't interfere with the 'regular'
>>> discussions?
>>>
>>
>> I'll try to spend some time cleaning up the runs next week.
>>
>>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
View raw message