Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 974C7F8C3 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88185 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2013 23:33:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 88155 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2013 23:33:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 88146 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2013 23:33:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:33:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.59.1.219] (HELO icp-osb-irony-out3.external.iinet.net.au) (203.59.1.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:33:35 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAAb2ZVF8laW6/2dsb2JhbAANQ8UAgSODEwEBAQMBfgsLDS4LV4gnq1eTaIJOjBU6FoJKYQOdJow9gUg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,450,1363104000"; d="scan'208";a="115489014" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.8]) ([124.149.165.186]) by icp-osb-irony-out3.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2013 07:33:07 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release InstallApacheFlex 2.5.4 - RC5: (was: [VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 2.5.4 - RC5) From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:33:06 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <71C2EF45-6E5B-4D2F-A84C-B189DA1F8903@classsoftware.com> <0474A103-5EA2-4087-95FF-1E33CBF3DA89@classsoftware.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I don't want consistency for the sake of it. I dont see any advantage = of using a develop branch for utilities. I don't see it as consistency for consistency sake and I'd rather not = have to try and remember how all the repo's differ from each other. We = could also run into issue when want to make fixes/changes to utilities = while a vote is going on, further down the track if you had 2 votes = going on ie one for the installer and one for the the mavin stuff for = instance then there's the potential for it to get messy. Or perhaps we = break it up into yet more repos? Unless we want to revisit having a = development branch at all and do all work in trunk? > The tlf project does not have a develop branch as well. It does actually, you see if you do a git branch -r. Justin=