Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Subject: Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] committing?
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACK5iZe6h0bF_9Opc6QRGN-VKQ4G7C51ZKR=NkvQ8FgFvTCetw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:07:58 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <758B3992-D64C-4417-B31D-17A5F40F0B3E@classsoftware.com>
References: 
 <CAJs+wW1bt=LFngQax3=2qYvfxApg-8XiccV0BdtiJJ6Hx+DeDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CD9E1B69.51CAE%aharui@adobe.com>
 <CAJs+wW0equKNxSEhJikqHE8EBvQ=O3bC1fT77ArHJtRxUARJHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACK5iZe6h0bF_9Opc6QRGN-VKQ4G7C51ZKR=NkvQ8FgFvTCetw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org

Hi,

A little out of the loop here but have been following.

> Alex, personally, I dont mind the additional 6K. I would rather take =
IE6&7
> support in return for it.=20
=46rom what I understand there are other benefits other than just IE6+7 =
support right? IE7 support may be important to our existing user base ie =
enterprise?

>  But I agree that we need to keep the file size to a minimum as much =
as possible.
I agree but given that a single image can be more than 6K, and the JS is =
most likely cached (on 2+ visit and ever better if we can host in a =
central location) is that 6K really such a technical issue?

If the extra 6k saves me having to debug a single client issue or saves =
me any time coding it's worth it IMO.

Perhaps there's another way - it there a way to make it optional?

Thanks,
Justin=