Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.37 as permitted sender)
From: Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:06:36 -0700
Subject: RE: [FalconJX][FlexJS] committing?
Thread-Topic: [FalconJX][FlexJS] committing?
Thread-Index: Ac5BIvGsOomOGtz4RPiqxNT0VNEwuQAAmEuOAAKJ1BA=
Message-ID: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419BDEBC3826@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAJs+wW3MsdPr9LAYW2Km=N_-91hAtB_vN7LvsbibTu2L0Fsh-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CD9D862C.51C1C%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD9D862C.51C1C%aharui@adobe.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I think 'git branch -r' may list the remote branches even if you don't have=
 corresponding local branches.

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:53 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] committing?

That's something I don't like about Git. I have to pull to see a listing of=
 new public branches.


On 4/24/13 12:35 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> There is (in my GUI at least) now a remote branch 'goog.events'.
>=20
> EdB
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Also, I am not seeing a new public branch for these changes.  Did you=20
>> just commit them instead?
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 4/24/13 12:08 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> I'm just starting to look at the diffs. But please, no variables=20
>>> named "assing" :-)
>>>=20
>>> So do you really believe it will take more than 6K of minified code=20
>>> to fix any bugs related to events in the current implementation?
>>>=20
>>> I'm wondering if the motivation behind goog.events is to get an=20
>>> event system to work across a lot of older browsers we don't care=20
>>> about these days like
>>> IE6 and IE7.  If that's the case, why take on all of that code?
>>>=20
>>> I know when Adobe wrote the JS layer for BrowserManager it had a lot=20
>>> of code paths we can probably drop if we don't have to support older br=
owsers.
>>>=20
>>> I wouldn't want to take a 6K hit unless we really understand what=20
>>> we're getting for it.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 4/24/13 11:45 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> In short (I have the branch updated and ready to be published: yes=20
>>>> to all
>>>> three:
>>>>=20
>>>> 1) it adds about 6k to the file (26k -> 32k)
>>>> 2) yes, without modification, so no more IE8Utils or whatever
>>>> 3) yes
>>>>=20
>>>> But I'll still publish a branch first, so you can see for yourself=20
>>>> (there are some other changes/fixes in there as well).
>>>>=20
>>>> EdB
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> I think I don't have any more commits planned on for flex-asjs=20
>>>>> unless there is a bug fix or two.  I'm planning to work on a COMPC=20
>>>>> equivalent for FalconJX.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> My only criteria for your proposed switch to goog.events are:
>>>>> 1) is the minified js for the example as small as what we have now?
>>>>> 2) does it work on IE8?
>>>>> 3) when writing AS code, do we still get to use dispatchEvent(new=20
>>>>> Event())?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> If the answer to all 3 is yes, then I don't have a problem moving=20
>>>>> over to goog.events.  Otherwise, I would say the status quo is the be=
tter choice.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On 4/24/13 11:21 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> BTW: the re-write/refactoring was somewhat major, so I plan to=20
>>>>>> publish my branch first, so we can review and discuss. It will=20
>>>>>> still be nice to have it on par with the 'develop' branch initially,=
 though.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Erik de Bruin=20
>>>>>> <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I see you're doing some committing. I have the 'goog.events'=20
>>>>>>> based framework done for a previous version of FlexJS and I'm=20
>>>>>>> not waiting to update it to the latest and greatest.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Do you have any more commits planned for 'today'?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>=20
>=20
>=20

--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui