Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF52E9F4 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26417 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2013 18:29:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 26392 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2013 18:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 26377 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2013 18:29:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:29:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.182] (HELO mail-vc0-f182.google.com) (209.85.220.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:29:43 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fl11so76463vcb.41 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YwGf6cRVSR17USGR9xQSda4yNNVRyJ6xnsjul4HKn4c=; b=n5cdKpdWi1FqQ1ml4i77p7WC7cJJ6pFwiEuSBv1YMvyHfCRef4fMJqL6lZArK9baFD iN++s4oeg31wVUsuoJvIrUqoSM0e/j31PkcSmQhIT4lk8hl3MC4/27enM1GnM+2yS1sz 19kzd8tUOty5rnroK8L3lkIWA67nN1rDRnrheod3Zv4t5QJYSJo+4pcxhh7TA6UmeCVA hwwkqPY1OGdSQllHaGW4IMSLWzgq6Q3W08GN9rgsyPBFFxG7q3R3qj6uzgBFaugvKdiO 9yWeqOFd7np5MLgSmtCuTQlQgLzldlEpDY+A+edONxeVqtwc7Q2B/bUFpCTf6QuCj26u uhQg== X-Received: by 10.52.36.11 with SMTP id m11mr5959872vdj.117.1363112962332; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.147.5 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:28:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Om Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:28:52 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Iu4BIrfbQmLX4f6CaIicujDFMFo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Finishing the Git migration - READ FIRST To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9ac6e8d1c204d7be77a9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307c9ac6e8d1c204d7be77a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Ah, if you go here: SVN shows way more than 4: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/flex/ > > asjs > external > whiteboard > > I saw we move the whiteboards. Why keep new stuff on SVN and then have it > migrate it to Git later? > > I agree. I dont see a point in having a few on svn and a few on git. I have this list for now (I added "site") - asjs - external - whiteboard - site What about the "tlf" repo? > On 3/12/13 10:55 AM, "Om" wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Gordon Smith > wrote: > > > >>> let us first come to a decision whether we are happy with the new Git > >> repos or not. > >> > >> I looked back through the emails and can't find the URL for the new Git > >> repo. Can we inspect it using a browser or do we have to install a Git > >> client? > >> > >> > > The links are in the JIRA ticket. But here they are again - all > browsable. > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon.git > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-tlf.git > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-utilities.git > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > >> - Gordon > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: omuppi1@gmail.com [mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:49 AM > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: Finishing the Git migration - READ FIRST > >> > >> All, > >> > >> Before we get into lengthy debates about Git and Git vs. SVN, etc. we > >> need to first finish the migration process so that the new Git repos > will > >> become Read-Write. This means that the Flex PMC should first accept the > >> new branches and give INFRA a go-ahead. Here is INFRA's comment on the > >> JIRA ticket [1] > >> > >> "The git repos are also read only. Please have the FLEX PMC look at the > >> repos, see if they are acceptable, all branches are present, etc, and if > >> found accordingly, please update this ticket and I'll make them > writable." > >> > >> Instead of posting comments and discussing on the JIRA ticket, let us > >> first come to a decision whether we are happy with the new Git repos or > not. > >> > >> *Please respond to this thread with details on what repos are missing > >> (projects, whiteboards, etc.) *Once we have a consensus, I will post > that > >> list on the JIRA ticket. Once all those Reps are migrated to Git, we > can > >> give INFRA the go ahead to make them all read-write. > >> > >> Once that is done, we can apply a fix to the SDK - TLF problem and push > it > >> to the repo. > >> > >> To re-iterate, it is a waste of everyone's energy to keep discussing > >> potential fixes to any problem without getting the Git repos to become > >> read-write. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Om > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5549 > >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > --20cf307c9ac6e8d1c204d7be77a9--