flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: FXG to SVG - working example
Date Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:32:56 GMT



On 3/15/13 1:14 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <apache@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

> The problem is, SWF is so
> interconnected in the generator packages that you might have a problem
> getting a polarity with using the BURM.
Don't know what "polarity" meant, but hopefully it doesn't really matter.
> 
> On that note; This would take more study to fully understand, but at
> the moment I don't have time to investigate. I guess you will have to
> weigh the options or get a "feel" for the Falcon framework when your
> not under as much of a timeline/deadline?
> 
> That being said, the FalconJx framework was meant to be created in
> component sections, so if your end goal is to create things with it
> fully, I would suggest things being ported to its emitter, or it will
> for ever have a crutch on SWF.
> 
Good point about the generators being tied to SWF constructs.  But I am
assuming you that, in order to service different file types we will have
several emitters?  One for AS, one for MXML/AS?  I think I will create one
for CSS and someone will create one for FXG->SVG?  And since these two
probably won't generate JS "classes", I think they won't be tied to the SWF
constructs in the generator and thus will copy over "easily".

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message