Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25BC7E863 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 05:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5387 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 05:03:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 5222 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 05:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 5182 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2013 05:03:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:03:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 05:03:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Harui (JIRA)" To: dev@flex.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33366) The candidate input method can not follow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573196#comment-13573196 ] Alex Harui commented on FLEX-33366: ----------------------------------- I reviewed the code and don't see any obvious cause of a memory leak. Each text widget does use an additional TextField so your app will use more memory, but it shouldn't be that much. Does the simple test case show a memory leak, or is it some other scenario? How are you determining there is a leak, and what does the Flash Builder Profiler show? > The candidate input method can not follow > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: FLEX-33366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33366 > Project: Apache Flex > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark: TextArea, Spark: TextInput > Affects Versions: Apache Flex 4.8 (parity release) > Environment: windows,IE8 > Reporter: zy > Attachments: IMETest.mxml, IMETest.zip, QQSparkTextArea.as, QQSparkTextInput.as, QQTextAreaSkin.mxml, QQTextInputSkin.mxml > > > The spark:TextArea and TextInput Chinese candidate input method can not follow. > But mx:TextArea and TextInput not this issue. > I guess you only test the English input method, Chinese input methods all have this problem, it is affecting the user experience. > you can test this Chinese input method.all chinese use this. > http://dl_dir.qq.com/invc/qqpinyin/QQPinyin_Setup_1.1.1224.400.exe > I made a picture to illustrate the problem. > http://img.my.csdn.net/uploads/201301/24/1359028348_2400.jpg > If you are unclear, please let me know. I don't know english.I am very sorry. > Thank you! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira