Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DBB7E2C1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53993 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2013 20:05:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 53967 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2013 20:05:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 53959 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2013 20:05:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:05:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gavharbs@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.51] (HELO mail-ee0-f51.google.com) (74.125.83.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:05:40 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d17so4715139eek.38 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:05:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=FH2og5SU/1tCnzkqTdR0CggCk0ZTH/rI2afVrQkg4ZE=; b=WsyiBjUUIoEAIrAuanbtDhURs3znbAfLEcFQhdFI/GxLCWEHXQSUx0zKyDoDPZshCp L3LQVRX8vUczdcnhTtUpm3bWa4zFlB/1+7KN5cKFFyfWqs7jdf/4pvwOIffCXO0kT5R0 xk86XDSHqHfgfl1yvCSXdLjjTvlP6QOzzfGVmNW+lxoK54u5VT2+3/TmyFv3f9ZmL7oW iTSgDgmC+9hIPSgzeE5qlXsg2iirf8hQyZzUbTIni5cF58/DVEScPLW91rlREPn5c5ex gOJDQ0Qgaj+Op2TNDa3xR3xZroziOK+aRPlkH4LmoY8JpGEEKTAFFNG6C/qij47g3HM+ RZNA== X-Received: by 10.14.225.72 with SMTP id y48mr84213422eep.45.1361477120732; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (89-139-50-133.bb.netvision.net.il. [89.139.50.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm116913873eep.11.2013.02.21.12.05.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:05:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder From: Harbs In-Reply-To: <9725909F-814B-4E04-B5C7-EFF52681BC35@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:05:16 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <364081B9-3137-42F1-9BB2-C75FCFEB689E@classsoftware.com> <79E7C489-A86F-4317-8CBA-0A36B7358878@gmail.com> <6A956AA9-6180-4439-AB8E-447193DA923D@gmail.com> <9725909F-814B-4E04-B5C7-EFF52681BC35@gmail.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I got things to work -- sort of, by copying the source and sub-classing = ColorPicker to use it in mxml. Now things are totally wonky with my setup. I get the following error (5 times -- I have a main app and six modules. = I have no idea which modules cause the problem.) Unable to resolve resource bundle "alert" for locale "en_US". This happens even when I go back to targeting 4.5. On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Harbs wrote: > Something is odd here. >=20 > Here's the symptoms that I'm seeing: >=20 > Using either Flex 4.9 or putting experimental.swc in my libs, I do not = get the components in either mxml hints or ActionScript hints. >=20 > If I copy the source into my source folder I get hints for = spark.compenents.ColorPicker, but I don't get anything in mxml. >=20 > I see this in the css file, but I'm not sure where the namespace is = assigned. (I never quite understood how this stuff works) > @namespace "http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns"; >=20 > On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Bogdan DINU wrote: >=20 >> Indeed, it's not in the spark namespace yet. Try using direct = namespaces. >>=20 >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski = wrote: >>=20 >>> =46rom what I understand, the experimental swc had a different = namespace... >>> I don't think it was in spark yet.... >>>=20 >>> -Nick >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Harbs = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Yes. I'm talking about experimental. >>>>=20 >>>> I linked to the 4.9 release and s:Alert and s:ColorPicker were not >>>> available. I'm using the en_US locale. Not sure what to say here=85 >>>>=20 >>>> This is all clear as mud to me. I'll play around a bit trying to = wrap my >>>> head around this. I'll probably come back with more questions = later=85 >>>>=20 >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Harbs, >>>>>=20 >>>>>> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the = 4.9 >>>> release. >>>>>=20 >>>>> If you're talking about the ones in the experimental.swc, there = are in >>>> the 4.9 but you can use them with en_US only, I re-worked them in = the >>>> develop branch, so if you want to use them and even to have an SDK = you >>> can >>>> use with IntelliJ, constantly updated, chekout the develop branch, = do a >>>> first build, a release, use the makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder on = the >>>> released develop branch itself, not the resulting binaries. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Like that you can set this fresh SDK as the SDK you use if you = want to >>>> make change in the SDK, you'll have only to run the ant target >>>> corresponding to the lib you modified (and the other.locales too) = and >>>> you'll be able to test it right away on your sample projects. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Ask me if I haven't been completly clear. >>>>>=20 >>>>> -Fred >>>>>=20 >>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean >>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hi, >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I did use the installer. >>>>> Which would of given you last release 4.9. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the >>>> distribution for two reasons: >>>>>> 1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported. >>>>>> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the = 4.9 >>>> release. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Make a release build from the source with ant release, copy and >>>> unzip/untar the release and use the script in the IDE directory to = make >>> an >>>> SDK usable for Flash Builder or any other IDE. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Does the source need to be compiled before it can work? >>>>> Um yes. The source gets compiled in swcs (in the frameworks/lib >>>> directory) that your Flex application uses. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I wonder if now would be a good time to try InteliJ IDEA... >>>>> You would still have the package the SDK up, your issue is not = unique >>> to >>>> just Flash Builder. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hope that helps. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Justin >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> http://www.badu.ro >=20