Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com
 designates 157.55.2.78 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <DUB118-DS12E012CE14204BB8C6E171B4F70@phx.gbl>
From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
To: <dev@flex.apache.org>
References: <B52A60DA-F6B4-440F-BC22-DF57C2156ECA@gmail.com>
 <364081B9-3137-42F1-9BB2-C75FCFEB689E@classsoftware.com>
 <79E7C489-A86F-4317-8CBA-0A36B7358878@gmail.com>
 <B0B0737B-EBEB-480D-9883-43885931E1E8@classsoftware.com>
 <B4BA3B65-639A-41DE-BD88-4D4505A79948@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B4BA3B65-639A-41DE-BD88-4D4505A79948@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:37:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="Windows-1252";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal

I think theoricaly, that's could be possible, first the flex-config.xml 
shouldn't contain any declarations to the librairies except playerglobal, 
the lib folder should be emptied, you would have to create a project for 
each lib in your IDE, the build configuration of each one should take care 
of the dependecies,, may keeping an ant target for the locales... I should 
give a try to that at time to see if I miss something.

-Fred

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Harbs
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:03 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder

Okay. There's too much about the process that's kind of black magic to me. I 
guess after I finish getting this working I'll understand how everything 
ties together better. That's a good thing I guess� ;-)

I was under the impression that you could link to the source files instead 
of the swcs. Why is the SDK libs different than regular libs?

On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> I did use the installer.
> Which would of given you last release 4.9.
>
>> The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the 
>> distribution for two reasons:
>> 1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported.
>> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9 
>> release.
>
> Make a release build from the source with ant release, copy and 
> unzip/untar the release and use the script in the IDE directory to make an 
> SDK usable for Flash Builder or any other IDE.
>
>> Does the source need to be compiled before it can work?
> Um yes. The source gets compiled in swcs (in the frameworks/lib directory) 
> that your Flex application uses.
>
>> I wonder if now would be a good time to try InteliJ IDEA...
> You would still have the package the SDK up, your issue is not unique to 
> just Flash Builder.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Justin