Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA276D816 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54257 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 21:38:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 54225 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 21:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 54216 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2013 21:38:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:38:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.23] (HELO exprod6og109.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:37:59 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob109.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKURLNIXqfp9p97R1iQRKP/zxxGDGI4Zrn@postini.com; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:37:38 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r16LbaC9023103 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id r16La8XT004621 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:37:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:37:33 -0800 From: Alex Harui To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:37:27 -0800 Subject: Re: [OT] [FALCON] Falcon and IDE/FB integration Thread-Topic: [OT] [FALCON] Falcon and IDE/FB integration Thread-Index: Ac4EjHkF+RhH/3K2Svy4m2zlYmrJrwAJa9x1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the main goal for Falcon is simply to get it to a level where it ca= n replace MXMLC/COMPC on the command-line. Right now, no IDE vendor seems to be asking us if they can integrate Falcon. On 2/6/13 9:06 AM, "Cosma Colanicchia" wrote: > Actually, I see that FB currently supports: > - the legacy MXMLC/COMPC (using Adobe Flex SDKs up to 4.6, and Apache Fle= x > SDKs thanks to the installer) > - the bundled ASC 2.0 for pure ActionScript projects (but it seems > "hardcoded" in FB) >=20 > As legacy MXMLC/COMPC in Apache Flex are put in "maintenance mode" and > efforts are focused in advancing Falcon adding full MXML support, I > thinking about how can we benefit from the new Falcon architecture in an > IDE (shared AST for code assist and actual compilation, improved error > detection while typing, faster build when changing a class from a library > project used by another project, etc). >=20 > Just thinking that, if these points are still considered among Falcon > goals, and if FB will never properly adopt Falcon, at some point we may > want to start preparing docs and info about Falcon hooks and APIs to buil= d > this fantastic and shiny new Falcon-enabled IDE :) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > 2013/2/6 Alex Harui >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2/6/13 6:20 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >>=20 >>> At this point, it only supports the legacy compiler (that was the only >> one >>> available to Adobe when Flash Builder was being developed. In fact, th= e >>> legacy mxml compiler is still the only production one we have available= . >>>=20 >>> Adobe has not committed to using the new compiler in future releases of >>> Flash Builder. They haven't committed to supporting anything past 4.6.= 0, >>> but based on the trends they are making for this latest release I'm sur= e >>> support will be there when we have it ready. >>>=20 >> I wouldn't count on changes from FB. I think it knows to look for and c= all >> some jar to compile Flex projects. When we switch to Falcon, we might h= ave >> to emulate that jar. >>=20 >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>=20 >>=20 --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui