Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F9B7D38B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82893 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 14:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 82854 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 14:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 82843 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2013 14:20:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:20:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:20:45 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fw7so876269vcb.6 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=becx90BWFXis4UQaDowHkEyMepASvAwEIQlFI+V7NHc=; b=ata6xdU9lm9Cn2ZGkGG5nRNX9MTsbnaZAXcALu/E7sKfVr3M9cHGeK9HyC0jek9tsE sNVm+mChdCjSwU3Puk1bgpjXh8GrzVNXdHmYzI2+l5M76aoPxP5Fh4cgou3NdIEW3rnm 1AnspyT9dNXwWsF9jT8lzOBZv66InG6BFOCAtJlFZ6s6CUypmD4i4hiXwG4ltdTO+b8N h92zFEg9P06kUrc4qcavdhmGlyjItdcQLQzOibT+sYkR0+WFT0T/+9Vns8pZ3HbtOHVU sq5RgD/fXarFGqrmSog4yYV4Yx/+P2epq2Jrw8+GEsZDfRtOETyswD4JSbM2Kf8vUYQu mKhg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.30.108 with SMTP id r12mr29680824vdh.72.1360160423695; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.59.11.2 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:20:23 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: References: <51125B2B.1040809@leeburrows.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:20:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OT] [FALCON] Falcon and IDE/FB integration From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9b90e4554204d50f06a0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrYopC37wm5f/kqEpgRXkignmRSg242hmo5GSqXoeasTi7GmtOkMz94nigSzyYICadGMaL X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307c9b90e4554204d50f06a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 At this point, it only supports the legacy compiler (that was the only one available to Adobe when Flash Builder was being developed. In fact, the legacy mxml compiler is still the only production one we have available. Adobe has not committed to using the new compiler in future releases of Flash Builder. They haven't committed to supporting anything past 4.6.0, but based on the trends they are making for this latest release I'm sure support will be there when we have it ready. -Nick On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Cosma Colanicchia wrote: > Thanks for the hint, nice to know. > > However, if and when Falcon will be fully able to compile MXML, how will FB > support Apache Flex SDK if it had to bake-in the support for the Adobe's > own ASC 2.0 compiler in this way? > > Or, maybe, FB will only supports "legacy" MXML compiler when using Apache > Flex? (hope not, as this could really slow down Falcon adoption). > > Just a curiosity, time will tell.. > > > 2013/2/6 Lee Burrows > > > FB4.7 uses ASC2 by default for pure AS projects but it can be altered by > > tweaking config files. > > > > In .actionScriptProperties file for project, find useFlashSDK="true" and > > change to "false". > > > > > > > > > > On 06/02/2013 12:17, Cosma Colanicchia wrote: > > > >> Probably OT, but I just read that in FB 4.7 you cannot choose the FDK to > >> use for pure ActionScript projects (never tried myself yet). > >> > >> Does this means that Flash Builder is somewhat hardcoded to work only > with > >> the shipped ASC 2.0 SDK? If so, I was thinking about implications of > this > >> when MXML support will be available in Falcon, if it is going to be > >> supported in future versions of the IDE. > >> > >> I know that, before ASC 2.0/Falcon, the FB IDE was doing double work to > >> parse source files in order to provide code assist.. I also read that a > >> strong point for the architecture behind Falcon is allowing the compiler > >> to > >> work for the IDE, sharing the AST. > >> > >> Doing 1+1, I'd say Falcon will improve independence of the IDE from the > >> FDK > >> versions (as long as these new advanced compiler hook/APIs are keep > >> compatible), but this FB 4.7 behavior seems to go in the opposite > >> direction.. > >> > >> Any thoughts? > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Lee Burrows > > ActionScripter > > > > > --20cf307c9b90e4554204d50f06a0--