Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D73CEEA6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17940 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2013 17:44:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 17874 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2013 17:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 17866 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2013 17:44:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:44:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cframpto@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.78 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.78] (HELO exprod6og127.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:44:15 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob127.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUQLEWQ4f3EVxHoI1vxP5q3zyRJb+X2my@postini.com; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:43:55 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r0PHer1v002131 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r0PHhqAV003143 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:43:52 -0800 From: Carol Frampton To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:43:42 -0800 Subject: Re: facebook api Thread-Topic: facebook api Thread-Index: Ac37I4nFrQCgRsQJQyaVd98vrcL1AQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/25/13 7 :57AM, "David Coleman" wrote: >Hello, > >Our company makes facebook games. We are considering releasing an AIR >version of one of our games. We have considered using this library [1]. >The writeup says that it is "fully supported by Facebook and Adobe". >This begs me to ask the logical question... Is it (or could it be) >supported by Apache Flex? Social gaming is a very visible arena, and I >would love to be one of the first to be able to announce that we have a >multimillion user Facebook game fully based on Apache Flex. I have >already started testing to see if there are any benefits to upgrade our >codebase to 4.9.0, and I'm curious what the community's opinion would be >on our ability to use this library in a possible AIR app, in conjunction >with 4.9.0. > >Is this library going to stay with Adobe and cease progress at 4.6, or, >will it continue to be supported by the Apache Flex community? I thought I knew who at Adobe worked on this so I sent him mail this morning. I just heard back from him. - Yes, he was working on it but hasn't touched it in about 2 years. - He doesn't think there is anyone at Adobe or Facebook that is actively supporting it. - There is a relatively active group that self-supports the API though: https://groups.google.com/group/facebook-actionscript-api Carol