Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D918CD1C3 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70290 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2013 12:57:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 69819 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2013 12:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 69782 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2013 12:57:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:57:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.181] (HELO mail-vc0-f181.google.com) (209.85.220.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:57:27 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fl17so57603vcb.12 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:57:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nt9PdyZXROCuPZ8C/fAWwOM4Jw6ZFLxdDNXlgfaFXe0=; b=Wnuq9G8fjTxSd37JaecH2MQ0qjveWJC7ULN0hiVpygtTP95mZQMCbCgQPu+l3FURxT ZyQXludTrRnh6Jhji9lGWNX7ftaLFbK33UeXXNw6qWz/m8ZVMHgFBqap8e4BrHD+q31G ECtJWvSJIzFlDwfuIBWA4biGVyKq/K3+7CanLkxuAcNd7TSugbNTjxDJl2mselyMB4OE O4GHKGXt1UakQHGL7nGFySk+a4cZpCmMXnVKxJHmOZ8vnJ+5Ki9l+KyrmQoDAVu+9Fjk o86yYs1mlub+nP5DYEyupWTk9qwGJ7lCRwGQlxThbY4g+JROLqVhiV3skba5VFEVII5a iJeA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.108.142 with SMTP id f14mr105478648vcp.9.1358254624105; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:57:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.233.203 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:57:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: References: <274EE0F9C90D6046B7B64A42725B1411010369CB@hpisbs.healthpi.local> <50F4E2BE.9070105@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:57:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Google Maps From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04388ed562667404d3534cdc X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKpAPZb0gtHPE/PVCHKNWx+PJjHRv7l2x5ilNy6AaMyLJUn7qWWPz/oc1w76aUyhXeXy0V X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04388ed562667404d3534cdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Google is changing their API, and dropping support for the old version next year. The SWC they currently support only supports their "v1" API which is retiring. They are not making a new one. I wonder if ModestMaps will support the new API.... -Nick On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Avi Kessner wrote: > What does the js Api return that is different from the flex api? And can > we build a converter before Sept 14' ? > On Jan 15, 2013 7:02 AM, "Paul Hastings" wrote: > > > On 1/15/2013 11:34 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > > > >> I use ESRI's maps in my applications with great success. I even use > them > >> in my mobile apps. I highly recommend them. > >> > >> The POI is not nearly as populated as Google's, but they are leaps and > >> bounds ahead of everybody else. > >> > > > > ESRI's flex API is pretty good (our bread & butter GIS apps are all based > > on it but these are all tied to client's big buck arcGIS servers) but > their > > public spatial data is nowhere near google's, especially larger scaled > data > > in urban areas. ESRI's coarser data also effects other functionality like > > elevation profile & routing. > > > > google dropping flex was a crying shame. > > > > > --f46d04388ed562667404d3534cdc--