Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4A1DE458 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66112 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2013 00:14:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 66079 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2013 00:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 66069 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2013 00:14:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:14:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.59.1.221] (HELO icp-osb-irony-out5.external.iinet.net.au) (203.59.1.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:14:29 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBALkSB1F8qR+y/2dsb2JhbAANN75vgxEBAQEDAX4LCw05VzOHca0XgzCQA418gkhhA5wajUY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,555,1355068800"; d="scan'208";a="91244268" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.8]) ([124.169.31.178]) by icp-osb-irony-out5.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2013 08:14:01 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: Mustella News From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:14:01 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <74F2D29C-A73D-424F-90E5-54850ED6F02B@classsoftware.com> References: To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > Also, I believe that we decided we dont want to include Mustella in an > Apache Flex release. Do you think we should? IMO no need to include it as It's probably not a huge amount of use to = users of the SDK only to people who are actively working on = changing/fixed the SDK. Justin PS Be nice if moved into it own project in SVN as well.=