Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harbs.lists@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender)
From: Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_A37B6F9F-E9E8-4A69-9C16-BD4038BE5329"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:12:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20130114085856.8576339cw6eczcps@franklin.liquidweb.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
References: <20130114051200.11415g43smutjoxc@franklin.liquidweb.com>
 <CALorpXctgOzM8JeyTapwKeYzj+R35ro_m1+O_LRbtKyLYbAbPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0E7CF6486AC44249B0B674C6760449B40455FC7F@mcusquanez26v.mcdsus.mcds.usmc.mil>
 <CC402B5B-3BED-4C1E-AA04-330E7B7D55AF@gmail.com>
 <20130114085856.8576339cw6eczcps@franklin.liquidweb.com>
Message-Id: <4D319B8C-033B-4F10-BCFB-F63BD8A2343D@gmail.com>

--Apple-Mail=_A37B6F9F-E9E8-4A69-9C16-BD4038BE5329
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

Neither am I, but it looks much better.

On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:

> I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer.
>=20
>=20
>> Harbs
>>=20
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
>>=20
>>> I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm.  It has less =
clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicholas@spoon.as]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
>>>=20
>>> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, =
we have
>>> to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for =
my 8
>>> different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the =
possibility to
>>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or =
something
>>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
>>>=20
>>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about =
2
>>> hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash =
;S
>>>=20
>>> -Nick
>>>=20
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
>>> <apache@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
>>>>=20
>>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have =
another
>>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
>>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only =
selectively
>>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied =
branches of the
>>>> 10000's of framework files and tests.
>>>>=20
>>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason =
to
>>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new =
ASDOc
>>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and =
links
>>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
>>>>=20
>>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up =
to
>>>> Object but not the descriptions.
>>>>=20
>>>> Mike
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_A37B6F9F-E9E8-4A69-9C16-BD4038BE5329--