flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:08:37 GMT
Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the CMS.
 Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
would rather keep them on our domain.


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle

> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
> questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
> As you said, republishing them kills the build and that proves there must
> be some other option or hosting solution.
> Mike
> Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as>:
>  Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we
>> have
>> to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
>> different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
>> hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S
>> -Nick
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
>> <apache@teotigraphix.com>**wrote:
>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only
>>> selectively
>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of
>>> the
>>> 10000's of framework files and tests.
>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
>>> Object but not the descriptions.
>>> Mike
>>> --
>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message