flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>
Subject Re: Mustella News
Date Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:10:34 GMT
I'm kinda split on this one.  On one hand, I know most flex "users" won't
need the tests...  On the other hand, anybody interested in contributing
bug fixes, new components, etc. should easily be able to run the test suite
against them.  Maybe we include another variation of the source downloads
to have a tests package?  It would be great if Mustella was as easy to run
as downloading the ZIP, making a few env.properties changes and the tests

Mustella is 100x easier to run now than it was even 6 months ago when we
first got them, but making the barrier to entry even smaller would rock.


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:

> On Jan 28, 2013, at 7:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Also, I believe that we decided we dont want to include Mustella in an
> >> Apache Flex release.  Do you think we should?
> >
> > IMO no need to include it as It's probably not a huge amount of use to
> users of the SDK only to people who are actively working on changing/fixed
> the SDK.
> >
> Agree.
> > Justin
> >
> > PS Be nice if moved into it own project in SVN as well.
> I don't disagree but we might have to add some provision for flex versions
> if there is only one directory.
> Carol

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message