flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: Tools vs Impl - Don't mix the two was [ASJS] Integration with existing JS libraries and components
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:44:59 GMT
Mike,

I was aleady afraid we were boring, or worse, bothering the community.
I apologize for my part in it. Like you I'm more of a tool maker, as
you know well. I do get distracted when I get the impression that my
efforts (non-trivial, let me assure you!) are questioned and
belittled. So I get on the defensive and try to educate people that
I'm not making stuff up but actually think about and research stuff
before I start. And I get carried away as well.

But, I think I'm done ranting now :-)

I've just updated the build files for the Publisher to also work on
Windows, will commit those soon. Then I'm off researching another one
of my wild an inappropriate ideas for our little project :-)

EdB



On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Michael Schmalle
<apache@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Frank Wienberg <frank@jangaroo.net>:
>
>> Hi Alain,
>>
>> for Jangaroo, I answered this question here:
>> http://markmail.org/message/bwjwc7sxfbertu7f
>> For Flex / FalconJx, it seems nobody was extremely fond of the idea to
>> have
>> to keep all the white-space and take care of generating JS code in the
>> exact line of the source AS code.
>
>
> Ok, Do I have to start another thread with exclamation marks for everybody
> to tone the .... down!
>
> I cannot believe this conversation is taking the spin it is right now, some
> of the discussions the last two days have been ridiculous and serve no
> constructive purpose to any of these "initiatives".
>
> Frank, Being that I am about the only one working on FalconJx "innards" and
> conceived a way to even HAVE alternate outputs (just look at FalconJS's rats
> nest code), I would be offended by the above statement, if I was the type
> that actually get offended, which I'm not. (I left out the "doomed"
> statement)
>
> I SAID I would get you going on the output you need for "your" vision(with
> line numbers if need be) of the javascript emitter.
>
> I have put 100's of hours into this project and will be damned if it is
> doomed by squabbling over implementations. I'm a tool maker, Don't confuse
> the tool with the JOB! You and Erik are bickering about the Job, I am
> working on the tool, please do not confuse the two.
>
> Well, I guess I started another thread cause I don't want this buried.
>
> Mike
>
>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
View raw message