flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:03:35 GMT
I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm.  It has less clutter than the adobe
ones and load faster.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicholas@spoon.as] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs

Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..

By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle

> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only selectively
> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of the
> 10000's of framework files and tests.
> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
> Object but not the descriptions.
> Mike
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com

View raw message