Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46291D016 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81929 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2012 20:45:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81891 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2012 20:45:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81882 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2012 20:45:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:45:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.77 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.77] (HELO exprod6og126.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.77) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:45:10 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob126.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUMjswSraIsQfjeqhELiXyyidMFau+Bvo@postini.com; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:44:50 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBCKft1v006373 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBCKinAV004571 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:44:49 -0800 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:44:47 -0800 Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9 Thread-Topic: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9 Thread-Index: Ac3Yp5AQ/ooUf+zOTFib8u8twiZmqAAAfXHB Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/12/12 12:30 PM, "Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS" wrote= : >> Then will run mustella on it. Has anyone done a full mustella run on th= e >> rc >=20 > I didn't do it on the rc but the develop branch today and was wondering i= f > the last fixes could be integrated in the rc. I'm not sure what you mean by "last fixes". I forgot to start a mustella run on the changes I have pending last night. I have moved the changes ove= r to my Windows computer and am setting up to run mustella against RC2 (now that I've fixed the build script). If that passes then I will check those changes into RC2. I can't imagine mustella would pass against RC2 for anybody until I get my changes verified and checked in. Any changes you've made in the develop branch that are needed to get mustella to pass should get integrated over to release4.9 branch (although, in theory, better to apply the changes into the release4.9 branch and bring them back to develop branch). However, my current workflow is to run the develop branch's mustella against the RC itself, so I don't have to integrate develop branch mustella changes into release4.9. --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui