Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.39 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:42:47 -0800
Subject: Re: [ASJS] refactored JS framework and added publishing tool set
Thread-Topic: [ASJS] refactored JS framework and added publishing tool set
Thread-Index: Ac3TfB0YhcdKm0ygQpSRrbshcHKwmwAAMn+M
Message-ID: <CCE57E67.4992F%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJs+wW2UcjySeT7rDPR-PTUV=6DX1dbr1Y3rXZsvg_gYu6qruQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I must be missing something.  Where did base.js get checked into or how doe=
s
it get downloaded?

BTW, thanks for doing all of this.  I will try to modify FalconJS tomorrow.

-Alex


On 12/5/12 10:36 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> That is precisely what I've done.
>=20
> EdB
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Did you follow the thread where we may switch to base.js?  It appears th=
e
>> snapshot of code was trying to do that, but was incomplete.  How will th=
at
>> affect what you have done?
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 12/5/12 4:39 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi,
>>>=20
>>> As the subject suggest, I've completely refactored the JS framework
>>> and added the start of a publishing publishing tool set. What does
>>> this mean?
>>>=20
>>> 1. I've taken the JS framework that was donated by Adobe, taken it
>>> apart and put it back together again in such a way that it now play
>>> nicely with the Google Closure tools (Library, Linter, Compiler and
>>> Builder).  This give the framework developers a common ground to work
>>> on and provides for an approximation of most AS language features
>>> (inheritance, interfaces, access control etc.).
>>>=20
>>> 2. I've used ant to tie together the various available tools (FalconJS
>>> compiler and Google's Closure Builder, mainly) in such a way that when
>>> you run the build script in 'publisher', it'll take an AS project you
>>> point it to and create an HTML/JS release that includes all the
>>> framework JS files as well as the JS files resulting from the cross
>>> compilation of the AS project, all nicely optimised and minified into
>>> ONE JS file. You can already see most of this in action using a
>>> 'dummy' intermediate JS project I've added to SVN.
>>>=20
>>> Now, the refactoring I did means that the current output of the
>>> FalconJS compiler is no longer compatible with the FlexJS framework.
>>> I'll try to create a set of rules (or a template, or what?) for the
>>> compiler guys to see if they can change the FalconJS output such that
>>> it becomes compatible with my version of the JS framework and tool
>>> set.
>>>=20
>>> EdB
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>=20
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>=20
>>> T. 06-51952295
>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>=20
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui