Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cyrill.zadra@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B4CFCC9@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
References: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B4CFCC9@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:09:21 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAOHe5BGp8j6WHFrY+VY7OwhKtxDN7dxNhjYT9AABN9c8GYp4Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests
From: Cyrill Zadra <cyrill.zadra@gmail.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Gordon

> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml file=
s so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile each SDK =
SWC.

That wasn't me .. I think that work was done by Chema Balsas (see [1]).

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com> wrote:
> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml file=
s so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile each SDK =
SWC.
>
> Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc - passing, w=
ould anybody like to work on investigating the status of other tests that c=
ompile rpc.swc, mx.swc, spark.swc, etc.? We need to figure out whether the =
SDK source code needs to change because Falcon is pickier than the old comp=
iler, or whether Falcon has AS bugs that need to be fixed.
>
> - Gordon
>