Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121207144533.16561hjwybgqb4v1@franklin.liquidweb.com>
References: 
 <CAJs+wW0Di-Qby5-mDcyrD+CJBKT=AQaJ8J+mDeFuKVVe2UxHVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD8jDGJDtcNUzvsWD0oSSc32bYX-Q4uy0VTXfdM5GPAXwJjmiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs+wW188XTvv8XV0BgXFR7tQLa2-hrQGY7TQOH5ysBwD9bTdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121207081513.7696728im84x0xr5@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<CAJs+wW0zQq_v0G18giJMaeDuBc-T_1H+ULQfKewjZ9TxzO=G7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121207090945.17551cvvk7apcy3t@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<20121207100130.179441scvue0mzey@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<CAJs+wW2WbGAeyfuCSBxQwY9jQbgXA_co3TidiLvso9WYaHDu5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121207102705.33717wsadaemzg7d@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<CAJs+wW3miVCNESTAkrdikxur_wX3RpQkMk3Djqe4dwWv=jy1mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121207132443.84211x6by5tdfgx7@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<20121207142630.45212yeshk8g959i@franklin.liquidweb.com>
	<CAJs+wW3wPmKd1aaO-w3XGfCo9dxO9tmzA+bQGd0y5H1rcjAnng@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121207144533.16561hjwybgqb4v1@franklin.liquidweb.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:14:05 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAJs+wW3Dem+dVkSEkw3PDJ3scamRpwdfvE5XCqZTz4GCw6iNTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ASJS] Adjusting FalconJS output (no general discussion in this
 thread, please)
From: Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Correct on the first one [1].

On the second one, I would tentatively say "no, it doesn't have to be
there"... but a definitive answer might require some more research.

EdB

1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS+to+JS+translation+table


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Michael Schmalle
<apache@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>:
>
>> In GC, in combination with the way we set up inheritance, 'super()' is
>> 'goog.base()': [1]
>>
>> If called from the constructor - as we already implemented - 'this' is
>> the only argument.
>>
>> If calling a super method, use 'goog.base(this, "methodName", args)'
>>
>> EdB
>>
>> 1:
>> http://closure-library.googlecode.com/svn/docs/closure_goog_base.js.html
>
>
> Ok that makes sense, I'm guessing that if a class extends Object, nothing is
> present correct?
>
> What about a subclass that does not call super, does goog.base() still need
> to be there?
>
> Mike
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Michael Schmalle
>> <apache@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> After doing some more research, the super() implementation in general is
>>> a
>>> rats nest that needs to be figured out.
>>>
>>> Can someone give me the rules as to how super works with GC? If it's not
>>> present etc, is super.myMethod() allowed?
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl