Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1275DD243 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21716 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2012 19:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21686 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2012 19:42:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21678 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2012 19:42:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:42:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:42:00 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fc21so3551848vbb.7 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:41:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kNiX+czm2Aj7SWwNOzPBwMfA/TqhKYrMOCFs9/J/nSU=; b=QUFn4yJbdRRrxLqtfs3OVDyCh6SORFkZOfL42HhmKSbtsyQ+NIMY3L3rKWUWUhohVz 3P6NzFkmcOrGNUm7IN1Fi+hRGSEq9tl2WgWBE6y7Ks2nDN4bEzzWgW16pnxle0O/qgr2 YDuuM7kJTg9s/bRtWu+K4uxupRmPRp21r5eRPZ96jtWjDaYLOcXWLAQCcrlPQvkIEL3a I4hZPEwB0HtyHK0nZxfxH8b4Q0iUkg2+kxdd1QcHnU57H40tAgfbEPqYMMTa6aacTy9s lfuw9Qw2pRyvhoU1YhYx8C1eXHjHiWXeOnWOENL7jQv/YywsEAUPU8sLMtpbEPb0mr1q /nsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.115.133 with SMTP id i5mr2125777vcq.42.1354650099730; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:41:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.87.142 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:41:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <875B1FDF-339F-4C9C-83ED-399F023CF554@classsoftware.com> References: <095B61A5-3BDD-4730-8070-DA7AC9115C0E@realeyes.com> <875B1FDF-339F-4C9C-83ED-399F023CF554@classsoftware.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:41:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Next SDK Release Timing From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434c068fd498d04d00c0d6f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0434c068fd498d04d00c0d6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a > release IMO. > > Justin While I generally agree with this statement it is predicated on the assumption that releasing often can happen in an efficient and timely manner. Given the pending graduation and moving of repositories I would place my vote for waiting until after the logistics of graduation are completed. -omar --f46d0434c068fd498d04d00c0d6f--